How writing the book is going

Beloved Blogreaders,

I am amazed how when we just intend something, it's done. Or the timing is right. Something is right.

Right now I am speaking of the autobiographical book, The Little Things, although this also applies to the Godwriting book which I may actually call The Godwriting™ Book. 

Let me tell you what I do not do. I do not sit at the computer, thinking of what to write, what to tell about, what is significant etc. I do not think.

For one thing, truly, I have little opportunity to sit down and think about what to write. Every day, seven days a week, it is usual for me to spend six or seven hours at a stretch in the morning on daily Heavenletter matters. Then a bite to eat and a few words with Heaven Admin. Lunch often is at two.

After lunch, there are always new pressing Heaven things that come in, and emails to answer, and accumulated undone things that push their way in.

Then a walk on the beach, and, once a week, a grocery-shopping trip with Heaven Admin.

So let me tell you how the book is writing itself without any effort whatsoever. I don't have to think at all. Whatever I may be doing and involved in, an idea simply pops up, just as an idea for a Heavenletter might pop up on its own.

Quickly, when an idea for the book appears, I jot the idea down in an email I keep in drafts. Sometimes much more than an idea -- sometimes the development of an idea seems to engineer itself. It's not Godwriting by a long shot, yet it's not altogether Gloria writing on her own steam either.

So, in bits and pieces, the book seems to throw itself at me.

The pieces stir up emotions from long ago. I want to think that writing this book is going to expurgate all the memories I don't want to have hanging around.

I will end with an example, and thank you for reading:

Helen, oh, how I would love to know you now that I am wiser and love more. You were a tiny skinny thing, and had a Ph.D. and taught something in a prestigious college. It could have been literature. I don’t remember how I knew you. You were from New York, and I liked you a lot.  

What I would give to change the words I gave to you.

We were in our twenties, or maybe thirties, and you, with brown eyes looking up at me, asked me why men were not attracted to you.

I don’t remember now what flip remark I made. I probably told you something as silly as to wear ruffles and be more flirty.

How I would say something different to you now, Helen.

I would say to you:

“There is someone special who will find you. He is looking for you now.”

I would say:

“What do you need to go through all the dating and pawing for?”

I would say:

“All you want is one good man. And he will come to you.”

I would say:

“Follow your interests and not give a thought to being sought by men. One day you will look up, and he will be standing there.”

If I could, I would kneel and take back whatever I said that I saw made you feel smaller.

Oh, Helen. I weep for me, who I was then.

 

Comments

Join the conversation

Beautiful Gloria. Forgiving ourself is really the golden key to forgive the others. Wisdom is pure light. Since there is no time in quantum world, your forgiving is always conjugated at the present tense. So it was, so it is.

Beautiful comment, beloved Normand.

It is as God says in a Heavenletter somewhere regarding other people we may fault. "At the time, they didn't know any better."

In this case, I think I did. Or, least, at the moment I spoke, I knew I had wounded this dear person, and just left it there.

Ultimately, there is only one ego, a collective ego that is the fake copy of Oneness. Who is the forgiver, who is the forgivee? To wound or feel wounded is a tactic of ego. It is globally the ego that has to be forgiven because we gave it meaning.

What you say about ego is wise to pay attention to. If your statement is referring to my ego, then what you say fits. If you mean Helen's ego, I protest!

Are  we not to lift up our friend? In this particular situation, Helen put trust in me. She made herself vulnerable. Hers was not an ego question. She wasn't asking something ego-based and insignificant. She was asking an important deep-seated question. What courage and soul-searching that took for her to ask: "Why aren't men interested in me?"

It was my ego that came in with my answer as if I were some hot-shot who really knew something, as if her question were a trivial one. What I did was cast her heart aside, and we must not do that.

Closer to what you are saying is this: The truth is, Normand, I did honor Helen. But, instead, I wounded her and betrayed myself. It was my ego all right but not Helen's.

What I remember God's saying in Heavenletters is something like this: "Take your own wounds lightly, but another's seriously." 

May my apology reach Helen somewhere somehow.

Your thought is sent, dear Gloria. Thought does not concern itself with time and space otherwise you could never forgive yourself in the relative world. If somebody decides not forgive you, will you stay in his/her prison for the rest of your life? Atonement is possible only because we are intrinsically innocent otherwise guiltness would be made real and would oppose to God.

We certainly must take our own wounds lightly but another's seriously.

But God also says that making oneself vulnerable because someone betrayed our trust should also be considered lightly. It is in this sense that there is no "my" ego or "your" ego. There is only One God with multiple aspects of Him that we are and there is only one ego projected in a multiplicity of individual egos that we are not, because ego is unreal.

The beautiful paradoxical challenge is to ask for forgiveness and, at the same time, feel innocent. That is a real paradigm shift from traditional thinking! The same paragidm holds for "natural enlightenment" or "I need to nothing". Everything is tightly woven.

I meant: "I need do nothing".

" ... If your statement is referring to my ego, then what you say fits. If you mean Helen's ego, I protest! ...."

The One ego, the collective ego, is separated from Unity. Within ego, in its very construct, is separation. Thus one part of it hurts a person, while another part of it feels the hurt. But both are part of ego's separation technique - both reside within everyone separated from God.

True LOVE, that which floods through the heart, is of God, and it does not even notice insult or hurt. It lives in a higher vibration or frequency than hurt or injury.

Forgive me for babbling so many words. I examine ego many times a day to understand myself better.

It's so good to hear from you once again, dear Margaret. Thank you thank you.

ALL of this makes me look forward to your book all the more, Gloria! TRULY,
Sharon of Iowa City :)

Sharon of Iowa City, you are sure a motivator.

Dear Gloria,
Your book sounds like it is coming along so well!! Keep writing.

Thanks, Jacqueline. It seems like the more I write, the more I see to do!I It is indeed a project.

For all those who do not know Jacqueline, she has a Master's in Creative Writing, and currently teaches English at a community college. She also teaches creative writing to children.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Scroll to Top